Monday, May 07, 2007

The End..?

After Hours
All the gang has gone home
Standing on the corner
All alone

You and me steetlight
We'll paint the town - grey
Oh, we are so many lamps
Who have lost our way

Say goodnight, America
The world still loves a dreamer

And all the gang has gone home
And I'm standing on the corner
All alone.

Monday, February 05, 2007

urrrrrgggggghhhh.....

just saw a Wendy's commercial featuring "Blister in the Sun" by The Violent Femmes

(sigh...)

"...Black Flag sticker on a Cadillac...", indeed

(sigh...)

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Jack's back... ( to ruin your shit)


Yay! The greatest TV series ever is back to stir up high ratings once again . 24 is the best show on television and if you disagree with me then you are wrong.

Friday, December 29, 2006

National Park Service under orders not to offend fundies with geology


Park Service inanity: they won't tell us how old the Grand Canyon is
by Don Hazen

A new book claiming that Noah's Flood is responsible for the big hole is for sale at the Grand Canyon book store.


According to Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER) in a report released this week [PDF], Grand Canyon National Park is not permitted to give an official estimate of the geologic age of its principal feature, due to pressure from Bush administration appointees.

Furthermore, a book approved by the Service claiming the Grand Canyon was created by Noah's flood ,rather than by geologic forces, is on sale in the park for more than three years, even though a review was promised to Congress and the press. A Freedom of Information request [PDF] reveals that no review has ever been requested, nor taken place.

"In order to avoid offending religious fundamentalists, our National Park Service is under orders to suspend its belief in geology,"
stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. "It is disconcerting that the official position of a national park as to the geologic age of the Grand Canyon is 'no comment.'" PEER urged [PDF] the new Director of the National Park Service (NPS), Mary Bomar, to end the stalling tactics, remove the book from sale at the park and allow park interpretive rangers to honestly answer questions from the public about the geologic age of the Grand Canyon.

Hard to believe... where is Richard Dawkins when we need him?

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Good Riddance!

Friday, December 22, 2006

Republican aide busted for hiring hackers to change grades! Squirrels involved.




(from Talking Points Memo -- it's a beaut! -- brook)


Congressional aide admits trying to hire hackers -- to boost his college GPA

According to Network World's Paul McNamara, the communications director for U.S. Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT), Todd Shriber, hired two 'hackers' to break into the computer of his alma mater, Texas Christian University, and change his college grades.

He went trolling for the law-breaking 'hackers' on a computer security website. But instead of finding anyone to do his dirty work he came across a couple non-criminally minded techies who proceeded to chat him up about his scheme, draw out in explicit detail that what he was asking them to do involved mulitple felonies and then posted their complete email correspondence on the site, attrition.org.

This all happened back in September. But it was apparently only this week that McNamara, who has a blog at the Network World site, figured out who Todd Shriber was and started trying to get the guy on the record about what the hell he was thinking.

After what was apparently a good deal of prodding, Shriber told McNamara: "I did something that's greatly out of character for me and it's a mistake that I regret." Asked why he attempted this criminal enterprise: ""I would rather not get into that at all. I just got a little too far ahead of myself thinking about things down the road."

I'm tempted to stop there. But the correspondence is just too good in comedy terms and shows that not only does Shriber probably lack the ethical fiber to serve in Congress (I guess that can mean more than one thing) but may also be the stupidest person on the planet.

Here's Shriber's first solicitation ...


I came across Attrition.org for the first time. I enjoyed the site though I am not an expert
with computers. That brings me to my next point: I need to urgently make contact with a hacker that would be interested in doing a one-time job for me. The pay would be good. I'm not sure what exactly the job would entail with respect to computer jargon, but I can go into rough detail upon making contact with a candidate. Thanks for your help.


After he gets the first nibble he assures the 'hacker' he's talking to that ...


the job wouldn't be anything like invading a government mainframe for classified documents or stealing money from a bank. Rather it'd be a modification of some personal data.


Then he puts his cards on the table ...


OK here it is: I need an adjustment to my college GPA. Is this an absurd request?


It pretty much goes down hill from there, with the highlight probably being the request for pictures. The 'hackers' ask for pictures of the campus with squirrels and pigeons to make sure he's 'legit'. He says he doesn't live near campus anymore. Remember, he lives in DC, not Texas. So they tell him any picture of a pigeon or squirrel will do. Don't ask. You've got to read it to believe it.

Here's the picture of a squirrel (looks like near the Capitol) that this imbecile Shriber sent in ...



The whole thing is so amazingly ridiculous that I would be sure the whole thing was a hoax, except a reporter for a legit computer trade publication looked into it and it checked out and he even got the congressional staffer to 'fess up.

(UPDATE: SHRIBER FIRED!)

here's a SECRET DOCUMENT on the coming DRAFT

(yeah yeah -- most of "the old gang" is already TOO OLD for the draft as the upper limit is age 35 -- but, self-interest be damned! this document is AMAZING. it basically says that there are certain SKILL SETS such as language arts, network engineering and MEDICAL TRADES, that are TOO EXPENSIVE to procure the old fashioned way and so this paper recommends a SKILLS DRAFT to grab that talent against its will. makes me glad my trainiing is in philosophy. btw -- this document was obtained thru the Freedom of Information Act, so -- YOU AREN'T SUPPOSED TO BE READING THIS! -- enjoy, brook)


11 February 2003
ISSUE PAPER

Synopsis:

With known shortages of military personnel with certain critical skills, and with the need for the nation to be capable of responding to domestic emergencies as part of Homeland Security planning, changes should be made in the Selective Service System’s registration program and primary mission.

Situation:

Currently, and in accordance with the Military Selective Service Act (MSSA) <50 U.S.C., App. 451 et seq.>, the Selective Service System (SSS) collects and maintains Personal information from all U.S. male citizens and resident aliens. Under this process, Each man is required to “present himself for and submit to registration” upon reaching age 18.

The methods by which a man can register with Selective Service include the internet, mail-back postcard, checking a box on the other government forms, and through the driver’s license applications process in many states. The collected data is retained in an active computer file until the man reaches the age 26 and is no longer draft eligible. It consists of the man’s name, address, Social Security number, and date of birth. Currently, 91 percent of all men, ages 18 through 25, are registered, enabling the SSS to conduct a timely, fair, and equitable draft in the event the Congress and the President decide to reinstate conscription during a crisis.

However, the Secretary of Defense and Department of Defense manpower officials have stated recently that a draft will not be necessary for any foreseeable crisis. They assume that sufficient fighting capability exists in today’s “all-volunteer” active and reserve Armed Forces for likely contingencies, making a conventional draft of untrained manpower somewhatt (sic) obsolete. Yet, Defense manpower officials concede there are critical shortages of military personnel with certain special skills, such as medical personnel, linguists, computer network engineers, etc. The costs of attracting and retaining such personnel for military-service could be prohibitive, leading some officials to conclude that while a conventional draft may never be needed, a draft of men and women possessing these critical skills may be warranted in a future crisis, if too few volunteer.

Proposal:

In line with today’s needs, the SSS structure, programs and activities should be re-engineered towards maintaining a national inventory of American men and (for the first time) women, ages 18 through 34, with an added focus on identifying individuals with critical skills.

An interagency task force should examine the feasibility of this proposal which would require amendments to the MSSA, expansion of the current registration program, and inclusion of women. In addition to the basic identifying information collected in the current program, the expanded and revised program would require all registrants to indicate whether they have been trained in, possess, and professionally practice, one or more skills critical to national security or community health and safety. This could take the form of an initial “self-declaration” as a part of the registration process. Men and women would enter on the SSS registration form a multi-digit number representing their specific critical skill (e.g., similar to military occupational specialty or Armed Forces Specialty Code with Skill Identifier), taken from a lengthy list of skills to be compiled and published by the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security. Individuals proficient in more than one critical skill would list the practiced skill in which they have the greatest degree of experience and competency. They would also be required to update reported information as necessary until they reach the age 35. This unique data base would provide the military (and national, state, and municipal government agencies) with immediately available links to vital human resources…in effect, a single, most accurate and complete, national inventory of young Americans with special skills.

While the data base’s “worst-case” use might be to draft such personnel into military or homeland security assignments during a national mobilization, its very practical peacetime use could be to support recruiting and direct marketing campaigns aimed at encouraging skilled personnel to volunteer for community or military service opportunities, and to consider applying for hard-to-fill public sector jobs. Local government agencies could also tap this data base to locate nearby specialists for help with domestic crises and emergency situations.

With the changes described above, SSS programs would be modified to serve the contemporary needs of several customers: Department of Defense Department of Homeland Security (FEMA, U.S. Border Patrol, U.S. Customs, INS), Corporation for National Service, Public Health Service, and other federal and state agencies seeking personnel with critical skills for national security or community service assignments. The SSS would thus play a more vital, relevant, and immediate role in shoring up America’s strength and readiness in peace and war.

# # #

II. Are today’s SSS capabilities in sync with DoD needs?




A. Is there a need to preserve the capability of conducting a draft of untrained Manpower? If so, is the time frame still M+193?

B. How likely is it that DoD will need SSS to conduct a Health Care draft?

C. How severe are any other critical skills shortages in the military?

D. Are the Clinton-era’s abstract reasons for preserving the SSS and peacetime registration still valid?

E. Would DoD still fight nay and all Congressional initiatives to cut or eliminate the SSS?


III. Consider restructuring the SSS to address contemporary national security needs


A. Focus might be on relieving critical skills shortages

B. Include potential service to DHS and other government agencies that must attract/recruit skilled personnel

C. Explore the feasibility of developing a single-point data base of virtually all young Americans, 18 through 34 years old, immediately identifiable by critical skills possessed and practiced. Data base could be used for a draft in war and for recruiting in peacetime.



1. Would require modification of SSS mission and changes to
authorizing law.

2. Cost considerations


IV. Next steps – Statement of Administration Policy needed



A. DoD decides what services it needs and wants from SSS: Three options
for consideration:


1. SSS status quo; however, redefine the DoD mission guidance and time lines to make the SSS more relevant to DoD’s needs and the SECDEF’s policy. The current guidance of providing untrained inductees at M+193 runs counter to the SECDEF’s views and is out-of-sync with possible wartime scenarios.

2. Return the SSS to “Deep Standby” status. If a draft of any kind is highly unlikely and undesirable, eliminate peacetime registration and dismiss the 10,000 trained volunteer Board Members. However, should a draft be needed, it would take more than a year to get the system capable of conducting a fair and equitable draft from Deep Standby status.

3. Restructure the SSS and shift its peacetime focus to accommodate DoD’s most likely requirements in a crisis. Plan for conducting a more likely draft of individual with special and critical skills.


a. Minimum requirement: SSS mission guidance and time lines must be redefined promptly by DoD to allow more relevant pre-mobilization planning and funding for the possibility of a critical skills draft at M+90 or sooner. Peacetime registration of men 18 through 25 would continue, but consideration would also be given to identifying men with certain critical skills among these year-of-birth groupings. A post-mobilization plan would also be devised and computer programming accomplished for a full-blown critical skills draft. The HCPDS program is completed, brought to the forefront of SSS readiness planning, and tested through exercises. Without a reaffirmation of relevance and adjustment of mission, the SSS will be an easy target for reduction or elimination by detractors in the Congress and the Administration.

b. Expanded pre-mobilization requirement. SSS peacetime registration expanded to include women and men, 18 through 34 years old, and collects information on critical skills within these year-of-birth groupings. Requires change of law and additional funding (see Issue Paper dated 11 Feb 2003).


B. If more examination of the issues and options is needed, consider forming an interagency task force to provide the Administration with a policy recommendation. Possible players: DoD, SSS, DHS, NSC, OMB, Corporation for National Service, PHS, others.

C. After suitable analysis, obtain a White House Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) announcing plans for the future of the SSS (course of action 1,2, or 3, above).

D. If the SSS is to expand its pre-mobilization activities to include registration of women and collection of critical skills identifiers, it will be be necessary to market the concept for approval by the Armed Services Committees and Appropriations Committees and draft implementing legislation for congressional consideration. The changes will be implemented after the amended law is signed and funding is identified.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Princess of the Darkness


This is Becky wearing a goofy Packer hat thingy.

Monday, December 11, 2006

another example of how Dems are better people than Repubs

Speaker Elect Pelosi has proposed a severance package for the aides who are losing their jobs as their Republican bosses leave the House. She hopes to give them at least 60 day’s salary so they can make ends meet while they look for employment in the private sector.

That’s a lot more generous than Newt was in 1994 when the shoe was on the other foot. He refused to even consider a severance package for the Democratic aides, when Democratic leaders had pushed hard for a uniform severance package for their committee staffers who had lost their jobs in the Republican revolution.

Friday, December 08, 2006

Tony Coker Haiku

In honor of Tony Coker's 50th birthday
I propose a Tony Coker Haiku/Senryu fest


(ahem)


Maniac Dancer
Left His Pants By The River
Laughter Heard for Miles

(ahem)

Monday, December 04, 2006

Rock and Roll is Dead (?)

(here's a little rant that some might find interesting. i think it's poorly written and off the mark, but do tell what you think. -- brook)


Rock and Roll Is Dead
"Rock and Roll is dead." So says Robert D. Rayford (sic). You remember him? Scourge of morning talk radio, descending on an unsuspecting sleepy-eyed public long enough to dispense 45 seconds of his half-assed opinion and he's off again until tomorrow. Oh yes, and we're to take his word as gospel because he announced some baseball games 30 years ago. But I digress.

Today he was touting some article (unfortunately we don't have a copy of said article or we'd post it --Ed.) in which the Rolling Stones were held up as pariahs for continuing to make music and tour even though they're in their 50s (actually, Mick is 63 this year -- brook). Specifically they were lambasting Mick's continued lewd behavior and saying this was a symbol of pop music's decline. "Boy, I'll say," Robert announced. "Pop music's horrible. Sure wasn't like back in MY day, the Fifties."

I'll get to that obvious logical fallacy in a moment. First, I'll fully admit that ol' Mick's geriatric gyrations are a bit embarrassing nowadays, unless you get turned on by Depends and the smell of Metamucil, but let's not forget that the Stones have been tired since the 80's. "Start Me Up" was the beginning of the end. I'll be "Dancing in the Street" when they finally retire. I mean you can only beat the riff from "Honky Tonk Woman" into so many songs before people are gonna catch on. But if people want it, who cares? If you're going to blame them for anything, blame them for wanting to continue to make money. They still sell out concerts and sell millions of albums. "Gosh Keith, I've been thinking about it, and people are still paying us millions of dollars to rehash the same act we've had for over 30 years. We're making a fortune to stand around and belt out three chords for two hours every few days. I think we should quit this soft gig and go get jobs at Hardee's."

As for pop music in general, when the hell has it ever been good? I mean something very specific here. Pop music is, by definition, music that is popular. NOT music that's good. "Look at pop music nowadays," you say . Brittany Spears, Ricky Martin, Matchbox 20--yeah, it's fucking godawful, noone's arguing with ya there, pal. "What about the pop music in my day? Wasn't that so much better?" you continue. Well.......hell no it wasn't. When was your day? Five years ago? You had Ace of Base, The Real McCoy, and, well, Matchbox 20. Ten years ago? You had C+C Music Factory and Vanilla Ice. Twenty years? Did you like pina coladas? Well surely thirty years ago? Two words, pinhead: Captain and Tenille.

Do I have a point? Sure. Pop music sucks. It's ALWAYS sucked. It always WILL suck. From the days of Patsy Cline to the current onslaught of this fake Latin nonsense. Rayford of course made the logical fallacy of ascribing value to something merely because it was what HE experienced. Oh, sorry Bob, since that was what YOU had growing up it must have been choice. I'm burning my Screaming Headless Torsoes CDs and buying up some George Jones or whatever the hell you were listening to. Here's a question: who in the history of the freaking world ever grew up saying "man, all this music I'm listening to sucks pipe. I'm just gonna hunker down and wait a generation or two and see what THEY'VE got." No. Why? Because they were all busy screaming their heads off at Deep Purple concerts and Smashing Pumpkins Unplugged. Everyone thinks that the music they grew up listening to is THE music that defined whatever genre. Everyone thinks they're the stars in the movie of the universe, that only what they hold has value. But now I'm starting a different rant.

A note--too many people are going to, because they're idiots, confuse 'pop music' with 'rock and roll'. A simple glance at the radio station listings will tell you this isn't so. So now I get to bitch about rock and roll. It isn't dead, but it's lucky to be treading water right now. There are a finite number of chords in the world, and only a limited number of that to be realistically used in rock, and we've nearly maxed out the Credit Card of Creativity (yes that analogy sucked --Ed.); there's a reason why covers are practically required by law nowadays. But perhaps its sole saving grace is its ability to turn itself into an ideal rather than a style. Rock is, some people will say, just about rebellion, about finding a voice for the young, about spitting at the establishment.

Now personally I think this is bullshit, and just an excuse to justify putting OMC on 99x. Rock is a musical form and nothing else. The ideal of rebellion -is- rebellion. It accepts the current pop music simply because older people don't like it, and any actual merit it has is entirely incidental. (A month after writing this I read Milan Kundera's Immortality, and ran across a better articulation of this in chapter 14 of part 2 --Ed) Rebellion may create music, but music is not rebellion. Screaming naughty words to cover your lack of playing ability is not and will never be rebellion. Throwing molotav cocktails through a courthouse window is rebellion. Driving a truck through a crowded playground is rebellion. Rock never even started as any form of rebellion--it was a marketing ploy that record companies exploited by hiring white boys to play black songs. Rock and roll in the Fifties wasn't anti-establishment at all, it was a product designed to make money by selling records. The melodies were simplistic, the lyrics unchallenging. It was bleached, sanitized, predictable, safe.
Isn't that right, Rayford?

Saturday, December 02, 2006

the New Mile High Club -- coming to an airport near you!




(reality is rendering satire completely fucking useless. here's the latest -- before you board your next flight to visit grandma, you are going to posing NAKED for a TSA rent-a-cop in a "remote location" just to make sure you aren't hiding anything up your hidey hole. feel safer? i do. i think this should be done like on Roller Coasters -- so after you go thru "security" you get to view your pic and buy a copy if you like. "look, honey -- it's Grandma's Rectal Exam from flying the friendly skies last Thanksgiving! -- brook)


XRay Naked Pics for "Officer in Remote Location"



Just when you thought they were creepy enough. Just when they cornered one too many of our wives and daughters into a little screening area to start laying their hands on their bodies in the name of "security," it's not enough. These pseudo-officers, high on their tin soldier power, want to ogle our wives and daughters de-robed and vulnerable.

Phoenix Airport will be the first to test a new screening system that only felons deserve to be subject to. The screening system effectively photographs its subject nude.
According to the article, the images are seen by an "officer in a remote location."

You want some middle-aged man looking at a photograph of your 17-year-old daughter without her clothes on? A middle-aged man in a booth by himself?

This is the most odious proposal by the creepy TSA since September 11. I predict it will cause widespread outrage. I believe this airport might even see a boycott.

The TSA isn't satisfied with anything. They've forced us to buy every liquid we use for our hygiene two times: once in actual size and once in three ounce bottles. They've backed up lines and caused headaches and misery for millions of commuters. They're skeptical of 99-year-olds and six year-olds.

This is excessive and these machines will be abused by perverts hiding behind the curtains. I guarantee that the makers of these machines have a nice little financial deal with some corrupt politician in Washington. We shouldn't stand for this, and the airlines should use their bargaining power to tell these creeps, "No."

We will not have a bunch of Mark Foleys watching our wives and daughters from their private little booths doing whatever it is they are doing in there on our tax dollars.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

IMPEACH NOW

(i've been too sick and tired to write anything about the election, but this piece from dmsRoar on Democratic Underground really sums it up for me. what say ye? -- brook)


The Lost Message from the Electorate

Like many of you, I followed the election and the results carefully and passionately and understood full well just how much was at stake. Future of the country...survival of democracy...restoration of freedom...considerations that once could only have been hyperbole now were near understatements. And, like many of you, I found myself relieved after the Big Blue Wave rolled the nation into a nice deep cobalt-colored tide, at least for two years. Because, and let's make no mistake about it, the leverage of subpoena power and the threat of impeachment are massive. Democrats now hold real power, even without holding the presidency. This is also a fundamental problem for our Democratic leadership.

Like many of you, I've enjoyed watching Bush cower and backtrack and say the previously unutterable. Yes, it turns out that Democrats, even Nancy Pelosi, love the country as much as he does. Yes, he's not really so much the Decider as the Cooperator. Etc, etc, etc. Of course, these are sentiments that only abject fear could produce in our Wedge-Driver-in-Chief. And, of course, this fear comes out of the direct threat Democrats now pose to his power, his own perceived place in history, and perhaps even his freedom to walk freely outside of bars the rest of his life without the official charge of war criminal.

And, most likely, he will, in fact, cooperate with Democrats, at least on some issues. There's nothing like imagining your own public disgrace to motivate you, after all. And, yes, Democrats have the opportunity to now pass legislation that many of us will herald as long overdue, because, of course, it is. I have little doubt that there will be a new minimum wage and that other makeshift (but valid) midterm party planks now can actually find their way into policy. And, as we know, the administration's backpedaling on Iraq gives our troops, our country, the Middle East, our allies, the world a little bit of hope.

It's not enough.

It bears repeating and repeating and repeating: the hope of passing centrist and progressive legislation is NOT why Congress is going to be blue in January. We--meaning most of us here, and a majority of voters--marked our ballots, according to exit polls, based on two primary issues: corruption and Iraq, two issues, which, of course, are married to each other. We--meaning many of us here and a majority of people in recent polls--believe that if Bush lied he ought to be impeached. We--meaning most voters--destroyed the notion that all politics is local. We hated what Bush has done to our country.

And we now feel relieved, and for good reason, because there's hope that with the infusion of Democrats into leadership roles, with true power now held by Democrats, we can turn our nation onto a new course.

I suggest that a better reaction--though less noble, to be sure, and much harder on the heart and veins--is prolonged anger. I've found myself internally battling over whether my thirst for justice is really just thirst for revenge. I've always believed mercy was pre-eminent to justice, because, ultimately, none of us is equipped to decide real justice. But no more. Why?

Relief.

Like many of you, I am relieved. Plain and simple, I think our nation likely will avoid its own demise now. I think Democracy will survive, even if in its bastardized form, in this country. I believe Checks and Balances to some degree will be restored. I expect, someday, Habeas Corpus will be written back into law and my Constitutional guarantees will, once again, be guarantees. I am amazingly, stupefyingly relieved.

In short, for the first time in years, I feel safe. And that is why I think anger--over mercy, over political calculations and positioning for 08 and concerns about stigma regarding perceived petty payback--must dictate the course our party takes. With regard to basic protections, I feel safe, and I'm relieved about that, and those two emotions ought NOT to fit hand-in-hand in our country. The fact that I've rediscovered my relief in safety speaks, of course, of the astonishing cost this president and his Machiavellians have exacted from ordinary citizens.

No, it isn't understatement to say our country seems to have averted disaster, at least for the moment. True, our nation's poor and disadvantaged likely will still face the brutal effects of unchecked capitalism, and many other forms of inequity (and worse) will continue to pervade our nation. But we were headed toward fascism, even already living under its first touch. And that fascist bent was made possible through lies, manipulation, corruption, greed, and the yearning for power for power's sake at the expense of our country's true ideals, protections, and liberties.

We--the majority of voters--yelled at Democrats and Republicans alike. We're sick of Bush, hate his stance on Iraq and the lies he told us, abhor the rank corruption he and his cronies have practiced as a matter of course. We did not yell anything about cooperating to get things done, or even necessarily moving the country leftward, toward its center. Did we consider this and more when we voted? Of course. But we did not turn out in incredibly high numbers for these midterms to YELL about a new minimum wage. We voted because we were fed up, angry, tired of the President and of the costs--the damage to our rights, our nation's image, our government's excesses at our expense, our soldier's lives.

We YELLED this.

The Democrats' leaders immediately plugged their ears. They've made the political calculation that our party's image might be tainted by searching for justice. They've decided to make deals--a little legislation here for a little break there--deals which cash in our votes, yours and mine, for outcomes that have little to do with the message we yelled. Now, of course, impeachment is off the table. And, true, this might actually be what's best for the party. And this is politics, after all. But forgoing impeachment has nothing to do with what's best for the country. This nation must never face the sort of crisis it has faced these last six years. Despite all its problems and inequities, this nation should never even come close to verging on fascism. We, you and me, should never lose our Constitutional guarantees. We should never be ruled by corrupt lawbreakers. We should never be lied into war. We should never live in fear of what our leaders will do next. But we did...and the costs--to liberty, to pocketbooks, to reputation, to LIVES--will be tallied, will mount for years, as our country sorts out the astonishing price it's paid for this administration.

I am relieved. I am not afraid. I shouldn't have to feel such relief and I never have should have felt so much fear. And so, in my rediscovered safety and hope, I now find anger. I want justice. I want actual oversight. I want accountability for what this president and his administration have cost this country and its citizenry. For the sake of the Constitution, I want extensive prosecution and an outcome that errs, I'm sorry to say, on being merciless. I want impeachment. If these criminals are not held accountable, the next group of authoritarians to come to office will freely commit worse offenses, restrict our liberties even more, manipulate us even more, test even farther reaches of corruption. And make no mistake about it: there will come a time when democracy will not bounce back, when it will not be able to correct for corruption, lies, lost freedom, and tyranny.

The exit polls show that we--you, me, and our majority of voters--knew full well the damage our democracy had suffered due to illegal war and corruption. We knew it must not be allowed to continue now or to happen ever again. That's what we YELLED.

Impeach now.

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Naked Man Arrested for Concealed Weapon

EL CERRITO, Calif. -- A man was arrested on suspicion of carrying a concealed weapon after police found him outdoors -- naked -- and he told them he had a tool in his rectum, authorities said.

The man was lying on a tree stump, masturbating beside a nature path, near a Bay Area Rapid Transit station Thursday, police said.

John Sheehan, 33, of Pittsburg, was initially arrested on suspicion of indecent exposure. But when asked whether he was carrying anything police should know about, Sheehan mentioned the tool, said El Cerrito Detective Cpl. Don Horgan.

"You can't get much more concealed than that," Horgan said.

Officers drew their weapons and firefighters were called to the scene. Sheehan removed a 6-inch metal awl wrapped in black electrical tape without incident.

"When you're talking about an awl or an ice pick and you're dealing with somebody who's fresh out of prison, it's a weapon. That's a stabbing instrument," Horgan said.

Monday, October 30, 2006



http://www.gregpalast.com/the-great-florida-ex-con-gamernhow-the-felon-voter-purge-was-itself-felonious

http://consortiumnews.com/2006/102306.html

Monday, October 16, 2006

Pitiful


Air America is done. Stick a fork in it. Left wing, hate speech is just as stupid as right wing blather and America has had enough of it. This ought to be the year of the independants. Fuck em all.

Monday, October 09, 2006

Rumsfeld sold nukes to North Korea in 2000



The two faces of Rumsfeld

2000: director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea

2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change

Randeep Ramesh
Friday May 9, 2003
The Guardian

Donald Rumsfeld, the US defence secretary, sat on the board of a company which three years ago sold two light water nuclear reactors to North Korea - a country he now regards as part of the "axis of evil" and which has been targeted for regime change by Washington because of its efforts to build nuclear weapons.

Friday, October 06, 2006

The revolution has been PRIVATIZED

(i've been wanting to write about the hellride we're all on right now, but i've not had the energy. everyday brings another outrage... another revelation... another reason to want to crawl under a rock in new zealand. enjoy this and enjoy the upcoming republican "victory." the following was written by Paul Lehto, election fraud-fightin' hero -- brook)





I've Had Enough With Privatization; THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT NEGOTIABLE!!!


The following is based on the Appellant's Brief in Lehto v Sequoia, Washington State Court of Appeals, filed September, 2006. See http://tinyurl.com/ojdta (Opening Brief of Appellants Lehto and Wells)


This brief (which I helped work on the underlying arguments for) led me to a new (as far as I know) and politically powerful argument against all privatization efforts that are based on outsourcing or contracting away governmental functions, particularly "core governmental functions."

At issue here is not the government's ability to contract for copying services, but the ability to contract away fundamental things like elections and voting and prisons and parks and health care, etc. In this particular case, the ultimate delegation of a core governmental function is at issue, the delegation of the right and duty to count the vote.

These privatization contracts of core governmental functions necessarily result in fundamental changes to the structure of government, whether they concern elections or not.

Thus, the arguments made here against privatization are a way to unite all anti-privatization movements around a rallying cry of protecting our constitution!

The bottom line and the basic argument against these types of outsourcing, whether outsourcing democracy or outsourcing police or prisons, and against all forms of privatization of core governmental functions generally, is the following:

Taking the governmental function out to the private sector via "outsourcing" removes that function from the protections of the Constitution, which doesn't apply to protect citizens against the private sector such as corporations, beacuse of the "state action" doctrine and related legal concepts. As a result, Lawyers then argue that the constitution must follow the outsourced governmental function to the private sector, and lots of complicated litigation gives us, in the end, a mixed bag. When you think about it, however, at bottom these lawyers are, in effect, suing to get our constitution back. Yet, the only way the constitution is supposed to be able to change is by AMENDMENT, not by CONTRACT.


OUR CONSTITUTION IS NOT NEGOTIABLE!! (via contract or otherwise)

We can say this, we can demand this, we can INSIST on this, and we can say it quite forcefully: HANDS OFF OUR CONSTITUTION and our republic!

Thus, all of these privatization efforts, whether e-voting or private prisons or private police, are end-arounds of the Constitution,
and should be held to violate the constitution for that reason. We should NOT have to litigate (with mixed results) to get our Constitution back!

In that sense, the issue with electronic voting contracts is the same as with other types of privatization that people are fighting. Various anti-privatization efforts should make common cause, and rally around the slogan: OUR CONSTITUTION IS NOT NEGOTIABLE!!

And, not only is the argument powerful, but also I think different political persuasions will also respond to that type of argument.

At least, I think it's powerful since I'm sick of researching the ENTIRE constitution in these kinds of cases just trying to get it back! My level of fatigue finally told me that HAS to be wrong. Then I realized it WAS wrong. Maybe I'm a slow learner in that way. : ) Lawyers can get caught in the minutiae and miss the big picture, which is what this post attempts to show.

----Paul Lehto, Attorney at Law


Below is an excerpt from my own personal lawsuit in Washington state against Sequoia Voting Systems.

The brief is finalized/written by my attorney Randy Gordon based on arguments we worked closely together on. While there are other arguments made, including those related to the standing of voters to sue regarding any election, perhaps the main one attacks the delegation of a core government function (voting) into conditions of secrecy and trade secret vote counting.

The summary of the argument goes like the following:


Unconstitutional Delegation; Sequoia Performing Core Governmental Functions.

The Contract {between Sequoia Voting Systems and the County} instantiates a wholesale delegation by the government to a private company of the conduct of a core governmental function, the counting of votes in public elections. In light of the County’s undisputed lack of access to the source code governing the vote-counting algorithm and lack of access sufficient to ascertain whether tampering has occurred, invocation of “trade secret” protection in this context places the conduct of elections effectively outside of the power of the County or the public to review.

Sequoia has, in effect, assumed the obligation of the state by engaging in such a governmental function, yet, by virtue of its insistence on trade secret status and protection has refused to subject itself to the same limitations on its freedom of action as would be imposed upon the state itself and insists, with County support, on counting votes in a secret way. Such status and protection interferes with the ability of the Appellants specifically to review and verify the accuracy of the casting, tabulation, and counting of their votes and is inimical to the Constitutional and statutory regime governing the conduct of elections in the State of Washington. App. 2.

When, as here, a private contractor assumes the obligation of the state by engaging in such a governmental function, it subjects itself to the same limitations on its freedom of action as would be imposed upon the state itself. Put another way, when a citizen’s vote comes into contact with “trade secret” soft-ware, it is the secrecy, not the public’s right to know that must yield.




So, I say, hit 'em with the Constitution, THE WHOLE DAMN THING, so they can't STEAL the Constitution from us!

I'm getting REALLY tired, you know, of guys who "won't negotiate with terrorists" but WILL negotiate with our Constitution!!


A few last little nuggets or rocks, for your throwing pleasure:

1. At the center of democracy or any republic is elections. At the center of elections is the counting of the vote. The counting of the electronic vote in the US is a complete trade secret, that no citizen is allowed to witness or obtain information on. But it is downright chilling that the very core of our democracy is claimed as PRIVATE CORPORATE PROPERTY. (trade secrets are commonly considered intellectual property interests)

2. The above trade secrecy certainly violates the views of 92% of all Americans who when polled by Zogby in August 2006, favored the right of the public to witness vote counting and obtain information about vote counting.

3. The picture of tyranny is votes being counted in secret by your political enemy. The picture of corruption is votes being counted in secret by your political friends.

4. NOW LET ME SPELL IT OUT 10000%: Reading the above brief excerpt, it's clear that Diebold, Sequoia Voting Systems, ES&S, Triad, Hart Intercivic and the general corporate consortium of vote counters ARE, LITERALLY, OUR GOVERNMENT.

5. The electronic voting vendors own the heart of democracy, or purport to, as their private property. If a foreign nation made a modest proposal and forsook all of our forests, mines, cities, and military bases in exchange for the simple right to count our votes in secret, that proposal would be resisted "by all means necessary" including but not limited to the military, don't you think? So, ask the question: Who made these corporations KING?

6. It just keeps getting worse. The Bush administration's HAVA enforcement and local jurisdictions will negotiate away our Constitution, but we're "not going to negotiate with terrorists."


Time to talk to all the men and women who swore oaths to uphold the Constitution, and see where they stand!!

I think all real Americans who believe in the Constitution will stand with us, and those who don't stand with us simply don't believe in the Constitution. At least then, we will know what the issues are!

Terms of Use: this post is freely distributable in fully intact form with attribution to Paul Lehto, Attorney at law, contact is lehtolawyer at the domain name of gmail.com if necessary.

Monday, September 04, 2006

Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin dead at 44




Witnesses tell of freak death of Steve Irwin


A DOCTOR and witnesses have told of the desperate efforts to save Australian icon Steve Irwin after the Crocodile Hunter was struck in the chest by a stingray barb today.

Irwin, 44, died this morning after being fatally injured while filming a nature documentary off Queensland.

The news has shocked the nation and prompted a rush of tributes from politicians and the public alike.

Irwin's wife Terri was in Tasmania at the time of the tragedy and had to be contacted by police with the terrible news.

The couple's daughter Bindi, 8, was with her father in north Queensland, Irwin's manager John Stainton said from Cairns.

Choking back tears, Mr Stainton said Irwin had gone “over the top of a stingray and a stingray's barb went up and went into his chest and put a hole into his heart”.

(more at link)

Thursday, August 31, 2006

it's being called "the FEELGOOD movie of the year"





Death of a President: a fictional documentary looking back at the October 2007 assassination of George Bush.


Digital channel More4 will court controversy once again this autumn with a fictional piece, shot as a documentary, about the assassination of the US president, George Bush.

Death of a President seems certain to cause a furore on the other side of the Atlantic when it is premiered at the Toronto film festival next month.

In the UK the 90-minute film will be broadcast first on Channel 4's digital service in October.

The drama takes the form of a fictional documentary looking back at the assassination of Mr Bush in October 2007, after he has delivered a speech to business leaders in Chicago.

When Mr Bush arrives in the city he is confronted by a massive demonstration against the Iraq war and is gunned down by a sniper as he leaves the venue. The hunt for Mr Bush's killer focuses on a Syrian-born man, Jamal Abu Zikri.

Death of a President will use a combination of archive footage, CGI special effects and scripted scenes.

Actors play the fictional secret service agents and other aides who are with Mr Bush when he is shot and recall the incident in interviews recorded for the retrospective documentary.

Death of a President also looks at the differing viewpoints of the pro- and anti-Iraq war lobbies and the impact of Mr Bush's war on terror on the US.

"I'm sure there will be people who are upset by it. But when you watch it, you realise what a sophisticated piece of work it is," said Peter Dale, the head of More4.

"It's not sensational or simplistic, it's thought provoking."

Thursday, August 24, 2006

home

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

coincidence? Brits to reduce troops...US recalls Marines


Marine Corps to start involuntary troop recalls


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Marine Corps will start recalling thousands of inactive service members in the coming months to counter a steady decline in the number of non-active troops volunteering for duty, the service said on Tuesday.
...
To meet critical needs, President George W. Bush authorized the Marine Corps to issue involuntary recall orders to members of the Individual Ready Reserve, part of the non-active force. It will be the Marine Corps' first involuntary recall since the ground invasion of Iraq in 2003.
...
While the length of each activated servicemember's duty is capped, there is no time limit on the Marine Corps' authority to involuntarily recall Marines for jobs in the "Global War on Terror" -- a war whose parameters remain largely undefined.

"The authority is until GWOT is over with," Stratton said. "Until we're told to do otherwise, we'll use it."

The Marine Corps' move comes almost five years after the September 11 attacks that led the United States to declare "a war against terrorism of global reach" and more than three years after the Iraq war began.

Many Marines have performed three tours of duty in Iraq since March 2003. While the U.S. Army has provided most of the ground forces fighting an insurgency there, the Marines have carried a heavy load and been deployed in one of the most dangerous parts of Iraq, Anbar province.



http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=anoBl74syu3A


U.K. Planning to Cut Iraq Force in Half by Mid-2007 (Update5)

By Robert Hutton and Reed V. Landberg

Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- Britain plans to cut the number of troops it has in Iraq in half by the middle of 2007, handing over control for security earlier than previously forecast, two government officials with knowledge of the plan said today.

...

``We've done a lot of training for the Iraqi army over the past two years and (wait for it) ...they're up to the job,'' said Louise Heywood, head of the U.K. armed forces program at the Royal United Services Institute, a London-based military researcher. ``They've become a force that's capable of standing up to the insurgents.''


ah hell. if you've read to here, you might as well throw this in -- Ken Silverstein from last month's (August) Harper's gives the skinny on our little war.

The Minister of Civil War
Bayan Jabr, Paul Bremer, and the rise of the Iraqi death squads

In May 2005, Shiite militia groups in Iraq began depositing corpses into the streets and garbage dumps of Baghdad. The victims, overwhelmingly Sunni, were typically found blindfolded and handcuffed, their corpses showing signs of torture—broken skulls, burn marks, gouged-out eyeballs, electric drill holes; by that October, the death toll attributed to such groups had grown to more than 500. In November, American troops discovered more than 160 beaten, whipped, and starved prisoners—again, mostly Sunni—at a secret detention center run by the country's Interior Ministry. Since then, Shiite militias have become so integrated into the Iraqi government's security apparatus and their work so organized, systematic, and targeted that they are commonly referred to in Iraq (and in the American media) by their proper name: death squads. The death squads, which have expanded their area of operations from the capital across much of the country, are now believed to be responsible for more civilian deaths than the Sunni and foreign insurgents who are the United States' ostensible enemies there. By any reasonable measure, Iraq is in a state of civil war, and some of its most ruthless and lawless combatants are members of the government's own security units.

The rise of the death squads corresponds almost precisely to the April 2005 appointment of Bayan Jabr as interior minister in Iraq's transitional government. The Interior Ministry, which is something like a combined FBI and Department of Homeland Security, controls billions of dollars and more than 100,000 men in police and paramilitary units. Jabr was a former high-ranking member of the Iranian-backed Badr Brigade, the military arm of the fundamentalist Shiite Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) that is now the dominant political force in the country. After taking over the Interior Ministry, he quickly purged it of Sunnis, and members of the Badr Brigade were widely incorporated into the ministry's police and paramilitary units.

Jabr—who in May of this year was named finance minister in a new government headed by Nuri al-Maliki—has disavowed any personal or institutional responsibility for violence committed by the death squads. He has now acknowledged that some groups operated within the Interior Ministry while he headed it, but he insists that they were few in number; he blames much of the sectarian killing on terrorists “using the clothes of the police or the military.” At a press conference last November that followed the discovery of the torture chamber in an Interior Ministry building, Jabr said, “You can be proud of our forces. [They] respect human rights.”

Saturday, August 19, 2006

"a UNIQUE company" says Cheney RE Halliburton

(another great DU post -- b)

"Halliburton is a unique kind of company." -- Dick Cheney, September 2003

Total value of contracts given to Halliburton for work in the Bush-Cheney "War on Terror" since 2001.........More than $15 billion

Amount that Halliburton pays to the Third World laborers it imports into Iraq to do the work in its dining facilities, laundries, etc..........................................$6 per 12-hour day (50 cents per hour)

Amount that Halliburton bills us taxpayers for each of these workers.........................................$50 a day

Amount that Halliburton bills taxpayers for:
-- A case of sodas........................$45
-- Washing a bag of laundry...............$100

Halliburton's campaign contributions in Bush-Cheney election years:
-- In 2000: $285,252 (96% to Republicans)
-- In 2004: $145,500 (89% to Republicans)
Plus $365,065 from members of its board of directors (99% to Republicans)

Increase in Halliburton's profits since Bush-Cheney took office in 2000.......................................379%

Halliburton's 2005 profit (highest in the corporation's 86-year history)......................................$1.1 billion


"Since I left Halliburton to become George Bush's vice-president, I've severed all ties with the company, gotten rid of all my financial interest. I have no financial interest in Halliburton of any kind."-- Former CEO Dick Cheney, Meet the Press, September 2003

Annual payments that Cheney has received from Halliburton since he's been vice-president:
-- 2001: $205,298
-- 2002: $162,392
-- 2003: $178,437
-- 2004: $194,852
-- 2005: $211,465

Cash bonus paid to Cheney by Halliburton just before he took office...........................................$1.4 million

Retirement package he was given in 2000 after only 5 years as CEO.............................................$20 million

Number of times in the past two years that Republicans have killed Senator Byron Dorgan's amendment to set up a Truman-style committee on war profiteering to investigate Halliburton..............................3

Naughty word Cheney used during a Senate photo session in 2004 to assail Sen. Patrick Leahy, who had criticized Cheney's ties to Halliburton.........................................."Go #@!% yourself."

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

I need your prayers & thoughts

Some of you may know and some may not, but I have a son who would have been 21 in October. Early Sunday morning he was killed in an auto accident. I'm totally devastated and have never experienced grief like this before. It's so unreal. The funeral is on Friday in New York. And on top of that, my cat has a tumor on his face and has to have surgery. It seems minute compared to my loss, but my cat is like my second son! Things are not going well now but I know they will be looking up soon! I just needed to vent a bit. Thanks for listening and please think good thoughts for me and my family as we deal with this surreal grief.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

I'm Tryin' My Best to Be Terrified, Mr. President ...

(another great post from Nance Greggs over at DU... b)

Dear President Bush,

I am sorry to bother you while you’re on vacation and resting up from all your hard work, but there’s something laying heavy on my mind and the time has come to unburden myself.

I am a good Republican woman, and I want to do the right thing by my President and my Country. So I’ll just speak plain in hopes you’ll understand.

It’s this terrorism thing. The good Lord knows I want to cooperate with my government and be terrified all the time like I ought to be, but I just got a lot on my plate as it is, and there’s only so much worrying I can fit into my day.

I start my morning worrying about my financial situation. I am terrified that I won’t make the bills again this month, or that we’ll end up losing the house. We’ve been borrowing more often than not these days just to get by. I know you say that running up big debts, like the country is doing, don’t matter – unfortunately our bank doesn’t seem to see things in the same light.

I have to stop for gas a couple of times a week on the way to work, and when I see how much the price has gone up since the last time I was there, I’m terrified about how long I can afford to even get to the plant in the first place.

By lunchtime, I am scared to death that my boss is going to walk in and tell me that they’re cutting back again, and me the only source of income for the family since my husband’s place of business packed up and went to Mexico three years ago. Sometimes I shake so hard from the fear of it, I can hardly concentrate on getting my work done.

During the day, there’s other things preying on my mind as well. I’m scared all the time that me or the mister will get real sick, and having no medical insurance we won’t be able to get treatment. I’m scared each day will be my mother’s last, because she’s really taken a bad turn since the pills she needs aren’t covered any more.

Coming home from work at night don’t mean resting easy neither. Since my oldest boy joined up and went to Iraq so he could make some college money, I live in fear of the telephone ringing with the kind of bad news no mother should ever have to hear. And if someone comes by unexpected for a visit, I can tell you that knock on the door is enough to give me a heart-attack right there on the spot.

I used to like to rest a spell in front of the TV and catch up on the news after supper, but the truth be told, I’m more often than not completely terrified by what I see these days. Nothing but bad news about this new war they got going, when I’m already scared out of my wits about the old ones what ain’t close to finished yet and no progress seeming to be made.

I hear about little children getting killed, and I hear men talking about how they gotta keep killing each other no matter what. So that’s just another thing for me to be terrified about, that these men will just wind up blowing us all to kingdom come and I’ll wake up dead some morning never knowing what hit me.

And apparently that ain’t all I’m supposed to be terrified about – like I said, hard as I try, I can’t seem to keep up. Your people keep reminding me that my marriage will fall apart if certain folks are allowed to get married, that democracy as we know it will disintegrate if someone burns a flag somewhere, and we’ve only got a few months left before this War on Christmas thing flares up again and there won’t be a safe place left for good Christians like ourselves.

Now we got elections coming up and is it any wonder people don’t want to vote. We keep hearing that if we pull the lever for the wrong guy, we’re just handing the whole country over to our enemies, and who wants to take a chance like that? It’s not like you even know who’s who anymore either, because it seems the ones we’re told we SHOULD be voting for wind up not being on the ballot anyway because they might have to go to prison before they get a chance to be elected.

By the time I get to bed, Mr. President, I am exhausted from being terrified about all of this stuff, not to mention the pollution what seems to be getting worse, and this global warming thing that I know you said isn’t true, but seems to be destroying crops, and causing droughts, and killin' old folk just the same.

So as you can plainly see, it’s not that I don’t want to be scared witless by those terrorist plots you say are happening all the time. It’s just that I have so many other things to be terrified about these days, I just don’t see how I can fit it in.

I don’t want to sound ignorant, but the other side of this is that I don’t know WHO I’m supposed to be afraid of, and when. Is it Al Qaeda this week, or those Hizbollah fellas? Is it those homeless guys down in Florida who were set on blowing up buildings just as soon as they got the bus-fare together?

I’ve heard that this week it’s that guy what won in Connecticut – but if you could tell me how he figures into exploding bombs on airplanes, I’d be obliged because I just don’t understand the connection.

Maybe if you could put out one of those schedules, like they do for garbage pick-up days, I would at least know who I’m supposed to be afraid of and when. That way, if I do get a few minutes here or there to be terrified about this stuff, I won’t look the fool for being scared of the wrong thing at the wrong time.

Well, I know you must be busy there on the ranch, sitting on the porch and getting some good thinking done about how to get us out of all the big messes those Democrats who are running the country keep getting us into, so I won’t take up any more of your valuable time.

But thanks for listening. I know a good Christian man like yourself will take every word I’ve said to heart.

May the good Lord bless you, Mr. President, just as much as you deserve.

Yours Truly,
Mrs. J.Q. Public

Saturday, August 12, 2006

From someone in Lebanon

(from a swell davidson county democrat. this was in the inbox this morning -- b)


From someone in Lebanon


I have a friend who taught at American University in Cairo who now lives back in the states. She has a friend in Lebanon who wrote her. You might find this interesting.
Cc

Date
Tue, 25 Jul 2006 06:13:53 -0400

Just a little more on why I cannot watch the news.

I don’t know exactly what you’ve been watching, but I do know this—There is a huge disconnect between reality and the words and the policies and the blah blah blah we love Israel, here you go, have some more missi